Everyone has praise for the JBL mono amps, but does anyone know how their multi-channel amps rate ?
I just ordered my (2) 12" Brahmas, and am planning on getting the CDT CL-61A front components and CDT CL-6X for the rear deck. If you guys could maybe suggest some good four channel amps.(BTW my budget for an amp is under $250)
Replies (4)
swez on 04/9/2004 22:06:16
The JBL P80.4 when bridged to a 2 channel version is a potent amp for ~$170.00. For the system you have mentioned, need a pair of them as these are ~160 RMS x 2 @ 4 ohms
A pair of JBL P-180.2's are cheaper ($120.00/each) This is a 2 channel amp and nets 90 watts RMS/ch. Not a bad deal and a pair is in your budget range.
The newer PX 3004 is much more powerful and will deliver ~100 + RMS watts x 4. But this amp is out of your price range. A hefty $450.00 plus S&H.
The third option many like here, is the US Acoustics USB-4085. This 4 channel puts out 85+ RMS x 4 at $180.00
See: www.Sounddomain.com 2 & 4 channel amplifiers listings for more options.
Swez
blacktallon2000 on 04/10/2004 01:27:30
I want this particular install to be kind of perfect so this is the thing. Don't you guys always say that one should get a amp that has a higher power rating (RMS WATTAGE) than the speakers or subs it powers. I guess what I'm asking is will the 90 watts RMS per channel be enough for the CDT's because I believe they're rated a bit higher. I know I always ask a lot of questions but I really learn a lot from you guys. I guess I'm a perfectionist. Always trying to get the best results.
uochronos on 04/10/2004 04:09:34
i run my cdt which are the HD series and rated at 130watts rms off of my hu i plan to get an amp but even off the hu i dont have problems with clipping or distortionm because i dont try to play them louder then i can do cleanly. the problems start to occur from using an amp thats slighlly too small when you try to turn the gain or boost up farther then you can do clenly... so as long as you arnt trying to push the limits of your amp then a 80-90rms should net you nice results.
swez on 04/10/2004 08:55:59
Both points are valid. The main reason for opting for a higher RMS rated amp, is to provide a clipping free signal, and still have clean, high level spl. Easier on speakers when put to limits
However, if one knows what clipping sounds like, runs a smaller amp and has enough spl to enjoy the system, then that's fine too.
No matter which route we take, common sense is the main theme.
Swez
I just ordered my (2) 12" Brahmas, and am planning on getting the CDT CL-61A front components and CDT CL-6X for the rear deck. If you guys could maybe suggest some good four channel amps.(BTW my budget for an amp is under $250)
Replies (4)
swez on 04/9/2004 22:06:16
The JBL P80.4 when bridged to a 2 channel version is a potent amp for ~$170.00. For the system you have mentioned, need a pair of them as these are ~160 RMS x 2 @ 4 ohms
A pair of JBL P-180.2's are cheaper ($120.00/each) This is a 2 channel amp and nets 90 watts RMS/ch. Not a bad deal and a pair is in your budget range.
The newer PX 3004 is much more powerful and will deliver ~100 + RMS watts x 4. But this amp is out of your price range. A hefty $450.00 plus S&H.
The third option many like here, is the US Acoustics USB-4085. This 4 channel puts out 85+ RMS x 4 at $180.00
See: www.Sounddomain.com 2 & 4 channel amplifiers listings for more options.
Swez
blacktallon2000 on 04/10/2004 01:27:30
I want this particular install to be kind of perfect so this is the thing. Don't you guys always say that one should get a amp that has a higher power rating (RMS WATTAGE) than the speakers or subs it powers. I guess what I'm asking is will the 90 watts RMS per channel be enough for the CDT's because I believe they're rated a bit higher. I know I always ask a lot of questions but I really learn a lot from you guys. I guess I'm a perfectionist. Always trying to get the best results.
uochronos on 04/10/2004 04:09:34
i run my cdt which are the HD series and rated at 130watts rms off of my hu i plan to get an amp but even off the hu i dont have problems with clipping or distortionm because i dont try to play them louder then i can do cleanly. the problems start to occur from using an amp thats slighlly too small when you try to turn the gain or boost up farther then you can do clenly... so as long as you arnt trying to push the limits of your amp then a 80-90rms should net you nice results.
swez on 04/10/2004 08:55:59
Both points are valid. The main reason for opting for a higher RMS rated amp, is to provide a clipping free signal, and still have clean, high level spl. Easier on speakers when put to limits
However, if one knows what clipping sounds like, runs a smaller amp and has enough spl to enjoy the system, then that's fine too.
No matter which route we take, common sense is the main theme.
Swez
Copyright ClubKnowledge 2009 * All Rights Reserved
